Are these high radiocarbon “ages” a problem for the biblical worldview? First, remember that no detectable should be present within these samples if they really are millions of years old.Despite this apparent difficulty for the recent-creation view, this is, in fact, a much more serious problem for the old-earth view!

One of these assumptions is that nuclear decay rates have always been constant.

Although C decays fairly quickly, heavier isotopes (such as uranium-238) decay much more slowly.

Smallest Detectable Amount of Radiocarbon Sensitive instruments called acceleration mass spectrometers (AMS) are used to count the C/C ratio in a sample drops below 0.001 p MC?

One can estimate this time by dividing 100 p MC by 2 repeatedly until the resulting number drops below 0.001 p MC.

However, these excessively long ages are easily explained within the biblical worldview, and C should be present in specimens that are even a little more than 100,000 years old!

Nearly anyone can verify this for themselves using basic multiplication and division.

Virtually all fossils found within sedimentary rocks are the remains of creatures that perished during the Genesis Flood about 4,500 years ago.

Yet a skeptic might point out that the amounts of C found in these organic samples are smaller than what one might expect if they are only about 4,500 years old.

When today’s rates are used to calculate ages from certain radioisotope ratios, the results indicate that billions of years’ worth of nuclear decay of the heavier radioisotopes has occurred.

But there is evidence that this decay occurred in accelerated “spurts,” Why the High Radiocarbon Age Estimates?

And a radiocarbon result that contradicts old-earth dogma is not a good enough reason by itself to invoke contamination!