Criticism of carbon dating internetdatingsites net
By measuring the ratio of these two allotropes, one can determine ages of over 20,000 years ago with a standard error under 3%.Widmanstätten patterns are crystals composed of nickel and iron that are found in some meteorites.
There are two known living trees that are older than 4,350 years (the global flood would have occurred in 2348 BCE, according to Ussher) -- is 4897 years old (547 years too old).
The oldest plant alive has been dated back as far as 11,700 years (7367 years too old) and is called King Clone.
This article collects evidences that place a lower limit on the age of the Universe beyond the 6,000 to 10,000 years asserted by most Young Earth creationists (YECs) and the literalist Ussher chronology.
All of this evidence supports deep time: the idea, considered credible by scientists since the early 1800s, that the Earth (and the Universe) is millions or billions of years old.
By observing and analyzing the rings of many different trees from the same area, a map of the past can be recreated.
Even dates derived from individual trees contradict the recent-creation doctrine, since the oldest trees pre-date the supposed global flood.Moreover, these dating methods are not mutually exclusive: where their range, accuracy, and applicability overlap, the dates they produce agree with each other.(For example, all dating methods for the age of the Earth agree on a 4.4-4.6 billion year-old world.) This is important especially because YECs regularly claim that radiometric dating is unreliable — yet radiometric dating is unnecessary to prove an old universe, because we have many methods of dating at our disposal.The evidence against a recent creation is overwhelming.There is perhaps no greater attack on science than Young Earth creationism (YEC).These materials contain electrons that have been released from their atoms by ambient radiation, but have become trapped by imperfections in the mineral's structure.